Despite promises that community engagement activities will enable policy makers to identify complex and contested community attitudes, and that these will be included as part of the policy making process, a closer look at Australia’s engagement activities reveals something quite different. Our analysis reveals the extent to which industry interests have captured policy makers and regulators, dissenting voices have been excluded from engagement processes, and engagement processes have not connected with actual policy making activities. Reflecting on these limits, this paper concludes with recommendations for improving public engagement processes related to nanotechnologies in Australia.Visit Link
Subscribe to eNews
Catch all of the latest updates and new campaign resources by subscribing to tCA's eNews! Subscribe Now!
Help us provide free resources for
effective community action.
“A relational meeting as an encounter that is face-to-face – one to one – for the purpose of...
The remarkable campaign highlights an apparent rupture between the discourses and practices of deliberative governance and adversarial power politics....
Confronting Power provides an academically rigorous, yet practical and comprehensive framework and concepts for planning, implementing and evaluating...
Miles Horton, Highlander Centre
This is what is usually taken as apathy.